an american in a hotel
H in the hotel for two breakfasts running so wanted to believe that a libertarian was somehow a better being, a better ideological proposition than a neo-con. There was something sad about an American who wanted his America to be more liberal than the state apparatus he had never struggled against. (As if passivity was a positive value…) His argument against direct democracy was based on ignorance and identification rather than the constraints of equality and the limits of what a person, a society may desire and possess.
